Operational proof · Return scrutiny

An industrial return reports 31 employees while output rises 28%

The agent identifies the statistical inconsistency, assembles the record history and routes a clarification without inventing or overwriting the value.

Live request

Investigate establishment DP-MFG-18427 for 2025-26. Why did employment fall so sharply while gross output increased?

Evidence DESP-E04
Tool / answer modeinvestigate_industrial_return + validate_return_consistency

Returned evidence

What the system actually returned

Establishment
DP-MFG-18427
2024-25 employees
326
2025-26 submitted
31
Employment change
-90.5%
Gross output
₹148.6 cr → ₹190.2 cr
Validation state
HIGH-SEVERITY EXCEPTION
Corrected version
310 employees
Authoritative action
Officer-approved correction

Agent workflow

What changed from request to operational outcome

01
Observe

Resolve the unit and reporting period

The request is bound to establishment DP-MFG-18427, 2025-26, the authenticated officer scope and the current submitted version.

02
Investigate

Retrieve the evidence chain

The agent retrieves the establishment master, current and previous returns, classification, validation results, correction history and officer remarks.

03
Validate

Reproduce the anomaly deterministically

Employment changes from 326 to 31 (-90.5%) while gross output rises from ₹148.6 crore to ₹190.2 crore (+28.0%). No approved status change explains the variance.

04
Assist

Prepare clarification instead of correcting the value

The system prepares a concise exception package containing the conflicting values, rule result and source references for field/statistical clarification.

05
Act with approval

Preserve original and register the approved correction

After clarification confirms a digit omission, the authorised officer records version 2 with 310 employees. Version 1 remains immutable in history.

Resolved with human approval

The discrepancy becomes an auditable correction, not an AI guess

The accepted record uses the officer-approved corrected version. The original submission, validation failure, clarification reason, approver and timestamps remain traceable.

Control boundary

What the agent was not allowed to do

No silent value repair
No autonomous acceptance
Original version retained
Correction requires authorised role
Every source/version logged

Evidence artifact

Inspect the interaction behind this case

Reference proof DESP-E04 Execution trace

DP-MFG-18427 anomaly trace

Synthetic trace showing 326 to 31 employee anomaly, +28.0% output change, clarification and officer-approved correction to 310.

Primewayz industrial statistical intelligence

Explore a governed AI workflow around your industrial records, scrutiny process and statistical systems.

Discuss an Industrial Statistics AI Workflow
TO TOP