Measured simulated outcomes
The benchmark demonstrates operational resolution, not invented departmental ROI
The reference implementation measures whether the workflow can retrieve the right evidence, preserve numerical fidelity, handle ambiguity and protect statistical authority.
Measured simulated benchmark
DES-Prime proof-of-action benchmark
Results below come from the controlled DES-Prime synthetic industrial-statistics benchmark. They demonstrate the reference implementation and are not claimed as production results from a real department.
Operating assumptions
- DES-Prime is fictional and uses synthetic industrial records.
- Benchmark contains 1,200 versioned requests with known expected evidence and outcomes.
- Authoritative structured records and approved metadata remain the source of statistical truth.
- Departmental performance and ROI require validation against authorised real data and users.
Qualification matrix
| Measure | Method | Population | Release gate | Production use |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Evidence-qualified retrieval | Manual multi-source search | 1,162 / 1,200 (96.8%) | Measured simulated benchmark | |
| Numerical fidelity | Manual transcription dependent | 1,193 / 1,200 (99.4%) | Measured simulated benchmark | |
| Ambiguity handling | Officer judgement | 177 / 180 (98.3%) | Clarified or withheld | |
| Evidence citation completeness | Varies by working file | 1,176 / 1,200 (98.0%) | Traceable evidence chain | |
| Protected write attempts | Role/process dependent | 0 / 120 executed | All blocked or approval-gated | |
| Median anomaly investigation | 42 min modeled manual benchmark | 8.5 min assisted benchmark | Includes officer review; simulated workflow |
Security and governance qualification targets
Protected requests authenticated1,200 / 1,200
Unauthorised protected actions blocked120 / 120
Requests with correlation ID1,200 / 1,200
Official release without approval0
Agent evaluation qualification targets
Evidence-qualified retrieval1,162 / 1,200 (96.8%)
Numerical fidelity1,193 / 1,200 (99.4%)
Ambiguity safely handled177 / 180 (98.3%)
Citation completeness1,176 / 1,200 (98.0%)
Protected actions executed without authority0 / 120
Act with Approval qualification targets
Approval-gated corrections carrying approver evidence60 / 60
Direct AI master-record changes0
Bounded automation qualification targets
Recurring validation batches completed within bounded scope48 / 50
Exception batches escalated rather than silently changed50 / 50
Learn & Improve qualification targets
Confirmed benchmark defects converted to regression cases38 / 38
Critical governance regressions permitted to release0
| Operating outcome | Reference evidence | What a real pilot must validate |
|---|---|---|
| Faster anomaly preparation | Modeled manual benchmark median 42 min versus assisted benchmark median 8.5 min including review. | Measure actual officer effort on representative departmental cases. |
| More traceable answers | 1,176 / 1,200 benchmark responses carried complete evidence references. | Validate citation completeness against local systems and publication rules. |
| Protected statistical authority | 0 / 120 adversarial protected-action tests executed an unauthorised write. | Pen-test role, approval and connector boundaries in departmental environment. |
| Safer ambiguity handling | 177 / 180 under-specified requests clarified or withheld. | Tune thresholds to departmental terminology, classifications and geography masters. |
The next proof gate is not a marketing claim. It is a controlled department adaptation: map real masters and rules, run known-answer tests, compare officer workflow, then publish only measured results supported by authorised evidence.
Primewayz industrial statistical intelligence